Going for the Green

Robert Thompson's comments, criticism and opinion on the world of golf.

10 responses to “Granite’s Bunkers, Forgotten Clubs and a Round with Weekend Enthusiast”

  1. henrye

    RT. Apologize for not taking you there, but glad you made it back. Interesting that you preferred the new bunkers to the old “plain-Jane” ones. I liked the old plain-Janes, ’cause I felt they fit better with the “plain-Jane” course. Anyways, they were sold to the membership as a drainage issue and ended up being what you see today.

    As to the rest of your review – it’s pretty bang on.

    BTW, did you keep score and if so, how’d you do?

  2. Netz

    I do not why there is so much emphasis on sand traps, put concrete in them if you want. There is a quick cure, keep out of them.

  3. D

    the stronger the player, the less likely they’ll hit into a front bunker. Most of the time it’s on the sides….the weaker the player, the more intimidating a front bunker and less playability (slower rounds).

    having a bunker function only as an aim line is pointless also.

  4. grumpy

    Henrye asked my question RT—–who won?

    I know the heading of your Sympatico site is “3 off the tee” so please be honest.

  5. Tighthead

    The bunker change just seems like one of those cosmetic tweaks done for the sake of tweaking. Does it really affect play, or just make the club yet another late adapter to the current preferred style?

  6. Philip Bowllen

    Have to agree with Robbie, Granite is a forgettable course and it’s achilles heal is those swampland holes. Twice this spring they have been closed for 24 hours after a heavy rain. The good news is you found a course flat enough for Weekend to walk!

  7. Weekend Enthusiast

    RT:

    Thanks again for the game and the great day. Obviously, I am biased regarding the Granite and have different views than some of those expressed but we can respectfully agree to disagree on some issues.

    Tighthead – The new bunkers at Granite do affect play, IMHO. Most were extended, some shapes were altered while the lips generally increased in size making a ball in the same spot pre and post bunker change a very different shot. This impacts not only shots from the bunkers but also the golfer’s mindset in shot selection from different parts of the course. I suppose one measure of change is the actual score differences pre and post bunker change but that is just one measure of change.

    Philip Bowllen – I have never heard of the course being closed for 24 hours after a heavy rain…and have been at the course during the heaviest rainfalls this spring. No idea where that allegation came from. I requested in an earlier post that you refrain from personal attacks but obviously your reading and comprehension needs help or you do not care. If the former, I know of good tutors you can use and if the latter, shame really…

  8. Philip Bowllen

    WE – if you know of a good reading tutor then he/she will help you re-read my post and will draw to your attention that I didn’t say course was closed, only a couple of the holes in the swamp. Information from my neighbour who is one of your original and most enthusiastic members. He would have no reason to make this up.

  9. kerry

    RT,
    I really like 6 and 12 as well. I recall 13 being an awkward par 5, although I liked the green. I think 15 is underated short par 3. The green is semi-redan and can make for some fun putts.
    Slick greens and a few drivable par 4′s.
    Great practise areas as well.
    I recall many holes were not built as designed because of compromises with environmental groups.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>