Going for the Green

Robert Thompson's comments, criticism and opinion on the world of golf.

15 responses to “Coppinwood Restructures, 16 Partners Plan to Acquire Club”

  1. Kev

    I guess it’s not right to judge by one picture, but then again a picture is worth a 1000 words right? Well in my opinion that picture is worth 1000 average words at best! Are those dandelions behind the green??

    I think the GTA is a tough spot for a new high end course, because there are already so many courses around. Is it true that Ontario is one of the densest areas for per capita golf courses?

    It’s also crazy to hear that only 16 people are picking up the bill and liability for the whole course, especially when it was originally aimed at a membership of 300!

    Maybe i’ll get to play it some day.. i can dream right?

  2. D

    that’s a beautiful par three with wild flowers on the back nine. I think the whole back of the green was a dark violet when I was there.

    I was fortunate to be invited to play in 2008 and I enjoyed the experience immensely.

    Awesome club and great club house. It puts to shame some of the former clubs I was a member of. Glad, they are keeping Club Link’s hands off this property.

  3. George

    Great golf club but as RT says a few weak holes. For the record the GTA has a lot of golf courses but no where near the highest per capita. We all forget that the GTA is the 5th largest (populous) in North America.

    The 16 are deep. Especially with Maxium involved.

  4. john

    As one of the life-time member from the inception of the Club, Robert is not correct saying the club is looking for 300 EQUITY members. The Equity owners were around 10 or so from the beginning. What Robert should have meant was 300 life-time members. ..The change that may be taking place is equity ownership and it does not involve big numbers like 300. I have yet to hear from the management or ownership that the initiation fee will be drastically reduced.

  5. Philip Bowllen

    RT is pretty thorough and usually gets his facts fairly straight. In this case, he is above par with about 67% correct. But that’s closer than anyone else has come this week. Stay tuned……!

  6. Kev

    Well that would be amazing if that hill was full of violet flowers. It doesn’t sound like Clublink will get their hands on it, and i agree, that’s a good thing.

  7. Little Al

    I’ve played there twice, nice but not amazing. Their revenue does not cover the operating cost, so even if these 16 take over the equity they will have to dig into their deep pockets to cover each year’s budget shortfall.

    Any old timers remember the Mandarin G&CC back in ’91? They had to do the same deal. Look at them now.

  8. phil

    Little Al:

    1) what happened with Mandarin? what should we look at now?

    2) who is BIG al?

  9. Philip Bowllen

    Surprised RT didn’t have the scoop on tonight’s meeting. Lots of outsiders there so he could easily have had a rep on hand. It was a dandy. Stay tuned……..

  10. bill lata

    “Stay tuned…” in both of your posts, Mr. Bowllen?

    A “Dandy”?

    Do you freelance for the Enquirer? You do have a good feel for sensationalism, don’t you?

  11. Philip Bowllen

    Hey Bill, still tuned in? Don’t change that dial….!

  12. Philip Bowllen

    Deal completed, course opens Friday!

  13. Simon

    phil Says:
    April 14th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    1) what happened with Mandarin? what should we look at now?

    2) who is BIG al?

    Mandarin is a private club however you can find it on the Last Minute Golfer website. Any public player be able to play in there without member. Membership running low and members do want to pay more.

  14. Bill Lata

    Congratulations to the members for pulling together, and doing what needed to be done to maintain this wonderful club (and course).

    Well done.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>