Going for the Green

Robert Thompson's comments, criticism and opinion on the world of golf.

7 responses to “Sahi, Clark, ClubLink and Me”

  1. Land use golfer

    Most property in King is affected by both the Provincial Greenbelt legislation and the Oak Ridges Moraine legislation. Golf courses may be permitted within certain designations of each, but the process is much more difficult and restrictions on the % of disturbed area may make the project infeasible (if that’s a word). I’m surprised quite frankly that companies like Clublink, and the golf industry have had little to say about these pieces of legislation and others proposed by the Provincial government. They have had and will continue to have a major impact on the industry in the years to come.

  2. Wayne

    Isn’t 400 & King only a few kms from King Valley and Maple Downs? Is King Valley currently sitting with too many members? I heard that they lost more than a handful of members to Coppinwood in the last few years. If the courese was going to be public that it would also have to compete with Eagle’s Nest which is close.

  3. Mike

    Robert, Greenhills member here. I agree that clublink is good at letting the service slide. Conditioning is always suspect at best, Greenhills especially. Greenhills tends to be looked at as the second cousin to Clublink Toronto. Was there any discussion of purchases or developments in the London area. Mattrer of fact, I am suprised Clublink hasn’t dropped us yet.

  4. George

    I have to agree with the above statements re: conditions. Clublink has never been better than average in term of conditioning and playability. Better than most public golf course for Canada but sub standard to comparable private. Way below that of US and Mexician Resorts. The problem is they have no one on staff that has world class experience so how can you expect them to know the difference.
    RT is right with the collection of courses. They are lacking imagination and are very repetitive. Happens when you have 1 or 2 designers doing the work.
    At best they are no better than American Golf Corp.

  5. Matt

    RT – I am also a Greenhills member – BUT – I will be resigning at the end of this year due to the low quality of everything at Greenhills. Many members are fed up with playing conditions that are sub standard, especially since the local muni’s are in better shape and have faster greens. Clublink does have some great courses, just not in the London area. If you live in London, join Highland, The Oaks, or even St.Thomas G&CC before you ever think about Greenhills. Unless you are going to play 75% of your rounds in the GTA, Greenhills is not worth it. I will stop venting – thanks for letting me do so.
    BTW – Clublink will never buy anything else in the London area because they know they were lucky to get 500 suckers at Greenhills.

  6. joe golfer

    Hey Sims,

    I don’t think this SAHI guy even knows where London is…….

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>