Course Review: Rosedale Golf Club

Rosedale -- exclusive, and underrated.

Rosedale Golf Club (Toronto – 1919)

Designer: Donald Ross (and various including Bob Cupp, Doug Carrick and John Fought)


Rosedale is like a debutante heading towards a graduate degree. In other words it is known more for being the haunt of Toronto’s blue bloods, an elite, inner-city course that obscures its urban surroundings. But this isn’t just a plaything of the rich and famous – it is also a fine golf course, one that doesn’t likely get its due because many dismiss it as simply another club where exclusivity overshadows the fact the course is marginal. Not the case at Rosedale where the golf course is outstanding, easily one of the most overlooked in Canada. Built on a tumbling piece of property where a creek winds through a significant amount of the land, Rosedale offers a classic city course with elevation that one would not expect. And you almost never see the city, unlike courses like Scarboro, St. George’s or Weston, which simply can’t obscure their surroundings. Very cool – and very underrated.


The par five 8th at Rosedale.


  • Par fours – Rosedale is full of great fours (the first demonstrates that, but the third, with its raised green, is terrific, as is the short 9th, and the long 11th.) I am very partial to the stretch near the end of the course – the 14th, 15th, and 17th – which really are the teeth of Rosedale. All three are also different, with the 14th rising up the slope and tumbling down to the green (one of the best green sites on the course, in my opinion), while the 15th is shorter and allows for an easier approach. The 17th, with its plateau green and downhill tee shot, is clearly a standout.
  • The land really suits the two-shot hole, with the creek wandering into play on the front nine and the hills taking over the back. But at its heart, Rosedale has a smart, sophisticated routing that really links the various elements and uses all of the elevation change to really mix up the feel of the course. Some classics have one-dimensional elements, that can’t be said for Rosedale.
  • John Fought’s restoration finally (finally!!) brought unity to a golf course that was a mixed bag of the styles and ideas of a half-dozen different designers. I don’t know what period Ross he was trying to emulate, but the work is straight forward and consistent.

Rosedale's final hole.


  • The 18th hole remains a mixed bag at Rosedale, with the green being rebuilt several times. Now you hit up the valley to a bowled fairway – and the rebuilt green is solid, if unspectacular.
  • I really like the 16th hole, finding it a cool little par three, but the others – especially the two on the front — feel very similar, both with downhill tee shots to greens set near hillsides. Neither have remarkable green sites. I can’t say that they were clear misses either – they just don’t stand out like some of the longer holes.


The final tally:

Rosedale deserves more respect than it gets. The course is smartly routed, easily walked, with a variation of holes and unique strategies throughout. I suspect it isn’t more highly considered because many never see it – though it is located just off of Yonge St. Big on fun, and though it isn’t long by today’s standards, there are still plenty of par fours that can engage even big hitters. A tough invite by any standard, but one worth seeking out. A classic in every sense.

About author View all posts Author website

Robert Thompson

A bestselling author and award-winning columnist, Robert Thompson has been writing about business and sports, and particularly golf, for almost two decades. His reporting and commentary on golf has appeared in Golf Magazine, the Globe and Mail, T&L Golf and many other media outlets. Currently Robert is a columnist with Global Golf Post, golf analyst for Global News and Shaw Communications, and Senior Writer to ScoreGolf. The Going for the Green blog was launched in 2004.

8 CommentsLeave a comment

  • Good review, Rob. Rosedale has a lot going for it, besides the uber-wealthy membership. It’s come a long ways in recent years, with there now being some coherency and consistency in the overall design.

    No doubt the 4’s are the best part of the golf course, although I am not a fan of the opener or the closer.

    I wouldn’t say #9 is the best short 4 I’ve seen, but the fact that I made an Ace there puts it up a notch or two in my books.

  • Great review Robert. A little surprised the par 3-13th didn’t make your highlight real. I think it’s one of the best (toughest) par 3’s I’ve played.
    The Board and Mr. Fought did a super job in the course renovation. Perhaps the greatest improvement was to the 15th hole. Great work. Keep it up.

  • In the 2006 Ontario Mid-Amateur played at Rosedale GC, only one golfer was able to finish under par in the 54-hole tourney. That golfer happenned to be Rosedale GC member Peter McCarthy who registred who repeated in 2008 at Thornhill. Virtually every guest I bring onto the course concurs is far more interesting and difficult than reputed.
    If the 14th isn’t the most challenging Par 4 in Ontario, I haven’t played that course yet.

  • Wow – had to check to see if this review was dated April 1. Laughable. Scrapes into Score top 100 on exclusivity only.

    • If you have an opinion, try to provide some rationale to back it up. Without any back-up, its just another stupid comment!

  • Robert, you have forgotten Tom Bendelow, Rosedale’s. FIRST GOLF ARCHITECT ! Refer to page 35 in Rosedale’s 100year book and Jim Barclays Golf in Canada page 354.
    Lets have a game soon.

  • The 6th hole has fooled you as it does many visitors to Rosedale. As measured by the scores over par this little devil shows up as the hardest hole on the course!

Leave a Reply